Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disk drives imported with a controller fell within the exemption for Winchester Disk Drive under Notification No. 281/84-Cus.
Analysis: The description in the exemption notification was confined to Winchester Disk Drive. The imported goods were not simple disk drives but disk drives fitted with a controller, and the controller performed an independent interfacing function in the transfer of data between the storage medium and the CPU. On that basis, the addition of the controller altered the character of the goods so that they no longer answered the notification description. A certificate referring to magnetic disk could not extend the exemption to disk drives with controller.
Conclusion: The imported goods were not covered by the exemption and the benefit of Notification No. 281/84-Cus. was correctly denied; the appeal succeeded in favour of Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The exemption was held inapplicable to disk drives with controller, and the Revenue's challenge to the grant of benefit was accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification limited to a specified goods description cannot be extended to goods whose essential character is altered by an added controller performing an independent function.