Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether electric motors forming part of the final product were eligible as Modvat inputs under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, or were excluded as machinery or accessories under the explanation to that rule.
Analysis: The goods cleared from the factory were a composite assembly comprising the fans or blowers and the motors that powered them. On those facts, the motors could not be treated as mere accessories outside the finished product. Even if they were regarded as accessories, credit could not be denied unless they fell within a specific exclusion under Rule 57A. The exclusion relied upon by the revenue was directed to machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing goods, not to motors cleared as parts of the final product. The explanation was therefore wrongly applied.
Conclusion: The motors were eligible inputs and Modvat credit was rightly taken.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the order denying credit was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods that form part of the finished product and are used in or in relation to its manufacture are entitled to Modvat credit unless they are expressly excluded by the applicable rule.