Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Entitlement to Modvat credit on common inputs used in the manufacture of multiple final products, and whether credit could be denied on the ground that certain inputs were not capable of use in every product or that declaration relating to a part of the credit was filed after debit entry but before actual availment of credit.
Analysis: The inputs and final products were declared under Rule 57G, and the respondents were permitted to maintain a consolidated RG 23A Part II register. The record showed that the common inputs were used across the various final products, which were cleared on payment of duty. In such a situation, Rule 57F(3) did not require one-to-one correlation between specific inputs and specific final products for utilisation of Modvat credit. As regards the small disputed amount, the declaration covering the inputs was filed before the credit was actually taken, even though the debit entry in the register had been made earlier.
Conclusion: The credit was correctly availed and was not liable to be disallowed. The disputed amount of credit was also rightly taken. The Revenue appeal failed.