Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waste and scrap of wires and cables are excisable goods and, if so, whether they are classifiable under Chapter 85 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or under Chapter 74 as waste of copper.
Analysis: The issue was already settled in earlier Tribunal decisions concerning the same assessee, which held that waste and scrap of wires and cables are not excisable goods and that classification under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 does not arise. Those decisions had also been followed in later Tribunal orders on the same point, and appeals against them had been dismissed by the Supreme Court. On that basis, the present appeals were governed by the same ratio. The distinction drawn in the earlier order between marketable short lengths of cables and cable waste was noted, but it did not alter the position on the facts of these appeals.
Conclusion: Waste and scrap of wires and cables are not excisable goods, and no tariff classification issue arises under Chapter 85 or Chapter 74.
Ratio Decidendi: Waste and scrap of wires and cables, as cable waste, are not excisable goods; therefore, tariff classification does not arise.