Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after holding an assessment made under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 invalid, the Tribunal could restore the case to the Income-tax Officer and direct a fresh assessment from the return stage under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 despite the expiry of the limitation period.
Analysis: The return had been filed before 31 March 1962, so the assessment had to be completed under the old Act by virtue of section 297(2)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Under section 34(3) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the assessment period had already expired when the Tribunal made its order. The Tribunal's power under section 33(4) was wide, but it remained confined to the subject-matter of the appeal and could not be used to confer jurisdiction on the Income-tax Officer or to override the statutory bar of limitation. A direction to proceed afresh could not validate an assessment that was treated as non est and time-barred.
Conclusion: The Tribunal had no power to direct a fresh assessment after limitation had expired, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.