Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported image intensifier TV system and accessories used by a medical college hospital were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 63/88 as hospital equipment.
Analysis: The goods were found to be specialised medical instruments used for detailed investigation, correct diagnosis, and teaching through radio diagnosis. The notification exempted equipment imported by specified hospitals where the equipment was not manufactured in India and was essential for running or maintenance of the hospital. The expression "hospital" in the notification was wide enough to include institutions rendering medical, surgical, or diagnostic treatment. On the facts, the medical college hospital and the college functioned as one integrated institution, and the equipment was used in the hospital for diagnosis and training.
Conclusion: The goods were covered by Notification No. 63/88 and exemption could not be denied; the Revenue's appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Specialised diagnostic equipment used in an integrated medical college hospital for diagnosis and training qualifies as hospital equipment for exemption under a notification that includes institutions rendering diagnostic treatment within the meaning of hospital.