Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on synthetic filter cloth and asbestos millboard on the ground that they were not inputs but part of plant and machinery.
Analysis: The disputed items were used in the manufacturing process of aluminium and were consumable in nature. Synthetic filter cloth was used in filtering operations integral to the process of manufacture. Asbestos millboard formed the material for an orifice plate used to regulate the flow of metal between the feed box and mould, and the lower authorities did not dispute its consumable character. The expression "in or in relation to manufacture" was applied in a broad manner, consistent with the settled view that inputs used directly or indirectly in the manufacturing process cannot be excluded merely because they are not part of the finished product.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on both synthetic filter cloth and asbestos millboard was allowable, and the denial by the lower authorities was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Consumable items used directly or indirectly, or otherwise in relation to the manufacture of the finished product, qualify as inputs for Modvat credit purposes and cannot be denied credit merely because they are also described as part of machinery or plant.