Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether silicon carbide crucibles imported for use in electric resistance furnaces were parts of furnaces and, if so, entitled to exemption under Notification No. 155/86 despite their classification under Heading 6903.90.
Analysis: The exemption notification was concerned with parts required for the manufacture or assembly of the specified articles, not with the tariff classification of the parts themselves. The relevant certificates issued by the specified authorities were accepted, and the material showed that the crucibles were placed inside the furnace and required for manufacture of industrial furnaces. The fact that the articles were consumable and needed replacement from time to time did not change their character as parts of the furnace. Since the final product was covered by the notification and the requisite certification was available, the classification of the imported parts under Heading 6903.90 did not defeat the exemption claim.
Conclusion: The crucibles were parts of furnaces and were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 155/86; the Revenue appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For exemption based on parts used in manufacture of a specified article, the decisive test is the functional nexus of the imported goods with that article and the prescribed certification, not the tariff classification of the parts; a consumable remains a part if it performs that function.