Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sprinkler irrigation system manufactured by the assessee was an agricultural implement eligible for exemption under Notification No. 64/86-C.E. dated 10-2-1986 during the period prior to 1-3-1988.
Analysis: The exemption under Notification No. 64/86-C.E. was confined, for the relevant period, to agricultural implements and parts thereof. The goods manufactured by the assessee were described as a complete sprinkler irrigation system consisting of several components and were capable of use in parks, gardens, lawns and fields. The later notification extending exemption to mechanical appliances used in agriculture or horticulture operated only from 1-3-1988, which supported the view that the earlier notification did not cover such machinery. On the facts, the sprinkler system was not treated as an implement within the narrower pre-1988 exemption.
Conclusion: The sprinkler irrigation system was not an agricultural implement for the purpose of Notification No. 64/86-C.E. for the relevant period, and the denial of exemption was .