Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether filter aid material known as Dicamol was an eligible input for availment of Modvat credit under Rule 57A.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the width of Rule 57A and the expression "in relation to manufacture". The material was used in the manufacturing process for separating solids before extraction of the active ingredient, and the governing Larger Bench view held that the rule covers goods used in any activity concerned with or pertaining to manufacture, even if they do not enter the finished product directly or indirectly and are not identifiable in the final product.
Conclusion: Dicamol was an eligible input for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, and the denial of credit was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: The expression "in relation to manufacture" in Rule 57A has a wide ambit and extends Modvat credit eligibility to goods used in manufacturing activities connected with production, even if such goods do not form part of the finished product.