Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether calender rolls imported for use in the calendering section of paper-making machinery were classifiable as parts of paper-making machinery under Heading 8439 or under Heading 8420 as calendering or rolling machines.
Analysis: The goods were admittedly rolls used in the calendering section of the machine and could form part of a Fourdrinier paper-making machine. However, their classification as parts of the principal machine could not be accepted where Note 2(a) of Section XVI required the goods to be classified according to the specific tariff entry. The tariff scheme specifically covered calendering machines under Heading 8420, and the HSN notes under Heading 8439 expressly excluded calender rolls from that heading. The reasoning was also consistent with earlier tribunal authority dealing with swimming rolls and accessories of calender stock of paper.
Conclusion: The goods were correctly classifiable under Heading 8420 and not under Heading 8439, and the classification adopted by the department was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the tariff classification question, and the lower order was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are specifically covered by a tariff heading and are excluded by the relevant notes and HSN explanatory notes from classification as parts of another machine, the specific heading governs over the general claim that the goods are parts of the principal machine.