Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plastic tanks manufactured for storage of petroleum products were classifiable as builders-ware under Chapter sub-heading 3925.10 or under the residuary entry under Chapter sub-heading 3926.90.
Analysis: The classification depended on the tariff description applicable to the goods. The expression "builders-ware" was understood in common parlance as goods used by builders, and a tank manufactured for storing petroleum products would not ordinarily be regarded as builders-ware. The goods were articles of plastic and did not fit any more specific heading shown to be applicable on the facts. The earlier tribunal decisions relied upon supported classification under the residuary entry where there was no evidence that the goods were builders-ware.
Conclusion: The tanks were not builders-ware and were classifiable under Chapter sub-heading 3926.90, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The departmental classification was rejected and the assessee's classification under the residuary entry was accepted, with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, a product will not be treated as builders-ware merely because it is a tank, and where the goods do not answer the specific heading, classification falls under the residuary entry.