Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on the infusion set supplied along with the finished goods.
Analysis: The infusion set was supplied in every case along with the finished product and was sold as part of the package value. On those facts, it formed part and parcel of the goods cleared for sale and was treated as a component of the final product. The precedent relating to tool kits was distinguished because that item was supplied only on request and did not form part of the goods marketed as such. The authority therefore accepted the reasoning that credit could not be denied merely because the item was supplied along with the finished goods, where it functioned as an integral part of the marketed product.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the infusion set was held admissible and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The order of the lower appellate authority granting credit was sustained, resulting in rejection of the Revenue's challenge.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an item is supplied uniformly along with the finished product and forms part of the package sold in the market, it can qualify as an admissible input/component for Modvat purposes, and a distinguishable case concerning optional supply of tools does not bar credit.