Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether HFDA 0581 semiconducting XLPE cable compound was entitled to concessional duty benefit under Notification No. 196/84-Cus. as cable insulating, impregnating or filling compound.
Analysis: The product was described in the technical literature as a vulcanizable semiconductive polyolefin developed for conductor shield and bonded insulation shield applications in crosslinked polyethylene insulated cable. The materials filed, including trade literature and technical references, showed that crosslinked polyethylene compounds are used in wire and cable coating and insulation, and that the fact that the goods were described as semiconducting did not exclude their use as insulating material in cable insulation systems. The goods were classified under Chapter 39 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and the notification covered cable insulating compounds falling under Chapters 38 and 39. The material on record was sufficient to bring the product within the scope of the exemption.
Conclusion: The product qualified for the benefit of Notification No. 196/84-Cus., and the denial of concessional duty was not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the evidence shows that a semiconducting XLPE compound is used as part of a cable insulation system, it may fall within the expression "cable insulating material" for purposes of an exemption notification covering such compounds.