Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported hydraulic cylinder, being a specially manufactured part for a hydraulic excavator, was classifiable with the excavator under Heading 84.23 by virtue of Section Note 2(b) to Section XVI, rather than under Heading 84.59(1).
Analysis: The invoice, catalogue, drawing, and technical write-up established a correlation between the part number on the imported item and the hydraulic excavator. The material on record showed that the cylinder was fitted on the stick attachment of the excavator and enabled excavation, indicating that it had no independent use and was meant solely for use with that machine. On that basis, the item satisfied the test of a part suitable for use solely or principally with a particular kind of machine under Section Note 2(b) to Section XVI.
Conclusion: The imported hydraulic cylinder was required to be classified with the excavator under Heading 84.23, and the assessee's classification claim succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed and the classification adopted by the lower authorities was displaced in favour of classification as a part of the excavator.
Ratio Decidendi: A component specially made for and shown to be used solely with a particular machine must be classified with that machine when the record establishes such exclusive or principal use.