Transaction value under customs law cannot be enhanced by notional averaging without a legally sustainable basis.

Declared transaction value for imported goods under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 could not be rejected or enhanced merely by averaging prices of other imported oils. The department had not established any statutory basis for finding the declared value unreliable, and the adjudicating authority's use of a notional average was unsupported despite its own enquiry finding no room for price increase. The operative principle is that transaction value must be accepted unless non-compliance with valuation parameters is shown; on that basis, the enhanced assessment was unsustainable and the assessee succeeded.

---

---

Issues: Whether the declared transaction value of the imported goods could be discarded and enhanced by taking an average of prices of other imported oils for assessment under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962.

Analysis: The transaction value under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 is to be accepted unless the department establishes that it does not satisfy the statutory parameters. The adjudicating authority had, on enquiry, found no room to increase the price of the imported goods, yet proceeded to adopt an average price of other oils merely by way of abundant precaution. No legal or factual basis was shown for rejecting the declared value or for substituting it with a notional average derived from other grades of oil.

Conclusion: The enhancement of value was unsustainable and the declared transaction value could not be discarded; the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessment based on enhanced value was set aside and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: The transaction value under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 cannot be rejected or enhanced without a legally sustainable basis showing non-compliance with the statutory valuation parameters.

---