Tariff classification of CNC simulator turns on suitability as imported, not on hypothetical modified use.

For tariff classification, an imported CNC simulator must be assessed in the condition in which it is presented for import, and the test is whether that article itself is suitable for any other use. The record stated that the simulator lacked key components of a normal CNC control panel, including drives, motors and feedback units, and was limited to training and demonstration. A mere possibility of later connection by modification or interface did not defeat classification as a simulator unsuitable for other use. On that basis, the simulator was classified under Heading 90.23, and the contrary view was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported CNC simulator was classifiable under Heading 90.23 as a simulator unsuitable for any other use, or whether its capability of use with modifications justified classification elsewhere.

Analysis: The imported goods were to be assessed in the condition in which they were presented for import. The record showed that the simulator lacked essential components of a normal CNC control panel, including drives, motors, feedback units and related parts, and that its function was limited to training and demonstrational use. The mere possibility of connecting it by modifications or interfaces so that it could be adapted for another use did not answer the statutory requirement that the goods, as imported, must be unsuitable for other use. The decisive test was the suitability of the imported article itself, not a hypothetical altered version.

Conclusion: The simulator, as imported, was not suitable for any other use and was classifiable under Heading 90.23; the contrary view was set aside in favour of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, the suitability for other use must be judged on the goods as imported and presented for assessment, and not on a modified or hypothetically adapted form.

---