Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the bulk drugs exported under bond and the bulk drug cleared for home consumption were similar goods for the purpose of utilisation of Modvat credit under Rule 57F(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Rule 57F(3) permits utilisation of accumulated Modvat credit towards duty on a final product similar to exported goods. The bulk drugs in question fell under the same tariff chapters, were all antibiotics, and shared common inputs. Applying the settled meaning of "similar" as not identical but corresponding or resembling in many respects, the goods were found to have the requisite general likeness. The earlier view that credit could not be so utilised was held inapplicable on these facts.
Conclusion: The bulk drugs were similar goods, and the Modvat credit could validly be utilised for duty payment on the home-consumed product; the assessee succeeded on this issue.