Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether special excise duty was leviable on goods manufactured when the duty was exempt but cleared after the exemption had ceased.
Analysis: The relevant levy was special excise duty, which was an annual impost under the Finance Act and distinct from basic excise duty. The goods were exempt from special excise duty on the date of manufacture, but the exemption had been withdrawn by the time of clearance. Applying the Supreme Court's ruling on the levy and collection of special excise duty, the Tribunal held that for goods manufactured while the levy existed though exempt, liability was to be determined at the time of clearance, and the exemption did not extinguish the levy.
Conclusion: The special excise duty was payable on the goods at the time of clearance and the appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: For special excise duty, where the goods are subject to the levy but exempt at manufacture and the exemption is withdrawn before clearance, liability to pay arises on clearance because exemption affects collection, not the existence of the levy.