Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether two way keys were classifiable under Item No. 68 of the Central Excise Tariff or under the earlier tariff item, and whether the Revenue's appeal against the duty demand could succeed.
Issue (i): The classification dispute was examined against earlier Tribunal rulings which had held two way keys to fall under the relevant earlier tariff items and not under Item No. 68. The question of limitation arising from the trade notice was not independently gone into, as the appeal was decided on the basis of the classification position already settled by Tribunal precedent.
Conclusion: Two way keys were not classifiable under Item No. 68, and the Revenue's challenge to the demand failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected and the connected cross objections stood disposed of accordingly.