Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while working out the refundable duty on freight charges wrongly included in the assessable value, the amount refundable should be added to the assessable value or to the wholesale price first and the duty element then worked out.
Analysis: Under Section 4 of the Act, the assessable value is the normal price, and where the price is a cum-duty price the effective duty element has to be deducted to arrive at the assessable value. The amount found refundable represents part of the consideration or sale proceeds that was retained and not returned to the buyer. If that amount is directly added to the assessable value, duty is effectively calculated on the refund itself. The correct method is to add the refundable amount to the wholesale price, work out the assessable value on that basis, and then determine the actual refundable duty after deducting the duty element.
Conclusion: The refund computation must be made by adding the deductible freight-related amount to the wholesale price, not directly to the assessable value; the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where excise duty is to be refunded on an amount wrongly included in the price, the amount must first be treated as part of the sale proceeds or cum-duty price and the duty element then worked back to determine the correct assessable value and net refund.