Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the magnavision projection system was classifiable under Item No. 33A of the old Central Excise Tariff or under Item No. 68.
Analysis: The equipment was found to consist essentially of a projection box, a trolley holding the television and video cassette recorder, and a screen. The television receiver and video cassette recorder were procured separately and assembled into a complete projection apparatus. Item No. 33A covered wireless receiver sets and specified combinations of certain enumerated items, whereas the goods in question did not contain the other components contemplated by that entry. The reasoning adopted in the later Supreme Court ruling on projection television sets supported the view that such equipment answers the description of a video projector rather than a broadcast television receiver.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under Item No. 33A and were correctly classified under Item No. 68.