Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned forged products were classifiable as forgings under Chapter 72 and entitled to the concessional rate under Notification No. 174/88-C.E. dated 13-5-1988, or whether they had already assumed the character of machinery parts.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured as die forgings and had not undergone precision machining. The record showed only processes such as skin cutting, proof machining and further customer-side machining, threading and boring before use. Forged products do not cease to be forgings merely because they are ready for further machining; they assume the character of machine parts only when machining and other finishing processes give them a definite shape, name, character and use as such parts. On the facts found, the products had not crossed that stage and remained forged products under Chapter 72.
Conclusion: The forgings were not machinery parts and were classifiable as forgings under Chapter 72, with the consequence that the Revenue's classification was unsustainable and the assessee's claim succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Forged goods do not acquire the character of machinery parts until they are precision machined or otherwise processed into identifiable parts with a distinct commercial identity; goods remaining at the forging or proof-machining stage continue to be classifiable as forgings.