Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible when watch straps cleared on payment of duty were returned by customers and reprocessed into different sizes in the assessee's factory.
Analysis: The returned goods remained duty-paid goods and were of the same category as the finished product manufactured by the assessee. Since the straps were notified as eligible inputs under the Modvat scheme, their character as a finished product did not prevent their treatment as input for re-sizing and reprocessing. There was no legal bar against such reprocessing, and allowance of credit did not pose any revenue risk because the re-cleared goods also suffered duty. The alternative provisions under Rule 173H or Rule 173L did not displace the admissibility of credit in the circumstances.
Conclusion: Modvat credit was admissible, and the Revenue's challenge failed.