Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the goods described as pieces roughly shaped by forging of steel were classifiable under Heading 72.08 or under Heading 73.08 as other articles of iron or steel.
Analysis: The goods were manufactured only up to the stage of rough forging, with machining, polishing and other finishing operations left to the customers. The material remained at a stage prior to becoming identifiable motor vehicle parts, and there was no evidence that the goods were marketed or understood in trade as motor vehicle parts in the form cleared by the assessee. The HSN Explanatory Notes were treated only as having persuasive value, and the decisive test was the trade and commercial understanding of the product. Following the earlier Tribunal view on steel forgings up to the stage of proof machining, the goods could not be excluded from Heading 72.08 merely because they were suitable for further machining.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading 72.08 and not under Heading 73.08, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Rough steel forgings that remain unfinished and unmachined, and are not yet identifiable as specific finished articles in trade, are classifiable by their commercial identity as forgings and not as finished articles merely because they are capable of further machining.