Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether glass fibre tapes manufactured by the assessee were covered by the nil rate entry in Notification No. 52/86-C.E. as fabrics, or were correctly classified under the higher duty entry.
Analysis: The relevant inquiry was whether tapes could be treated as fabrics for the purpose of the exemption notification. The reasoning accepted that tape is a narrow woven fabric, and that the width and nature of the material did not justify excluding it from the expression used in the exemption entry. Reference was also made to textile definitions and to the treatment of tapes in tariff practice, which supported the view that tapes fall within the genus of fabrics rather than outside it. On that basis, the contrary view taken in the impugned order was found unsustainable.
Conclusion: The tapes were held eligible for the benefit of the nil rate entry under Notification No. 52/86-C.E., and the demand of duty on that basis could not stand.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the classification question relating to tapes and obtained the corresponding consequential relief.