Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Nickel Catalyst and Nickel Aluminium Alloy Powder used in the manufacture of Stearic Acid could be treated as raw materials or component parts so as to qualify for the benefit of Notification No. 201/79-C.E. as amended.
Analysis: Notification No. 201/79-C.E. granted set-off only where goods falling under Tariff Item 68 were used as raw materials or component parts in the manufacture of excisable goods. The inputs in question functioned only as a catalyst to accelerate or retard the chemical reaction. They were not consumed in the manufacturing process and did not undergo any chemical change. The earlier Tribunal decisions on similar catalysts and processing aids were followed, holding that such substances do not satisfy the requirement of raw materials or component parts for the purpose of the notification.
Conclusion: The inputs were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 201/79-C.E. The Revenue's appeal was allowed and the order granting relief to the assessee was set aside.