Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for excisable goods cleared under a turnkey contract with price escalation, the applicable rate of duty is to be determined by the date of actual removal of each item from the factory or by the date on which the last item of the project was removed.
Analysis: Rule 9A(1)(ii) governs goods removed from a factory or warehouse and fixes the relevant date as the date of actual removal of such goods. Rule 9A(5) is a residuary provision and applies only to cases not covered by the specific clauses of Rule 9A. Where the date of actual removal is ascertainable, the specific rule prevails and the department cannot substitute the date of removal of the last item in a turnkey project as a new charging date.
Conclusion: The applicable rate of duty is the rate in force on the respective dates of actual removal of each item, not the date on which the last item of the contract was removed; the contention of the assessee succeeds.