Modvat credit on returned defective goods requires prior declaration as inputs under Rule 57G; undisclosed goods were ineligible.

Modvat credit on returned defective goods was denied because the goods were not covered by the inputs declared under Rule 57G. Although a finished product may, in some contexts, also serve as an input, the assessee's declaration identified other materials as inputs and did not include the returned goods in question. The cited precedent was distinguished because, there, the defective returned goods had been specifically declared as inputs. Credit was therefore not admissible, and the disallowance was upheld on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible on returned defective goods used in manufacture where such goods were not declared as inputs in the assessee's declaration under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules.

Analysis: The declaration filed by the assessee showed certain metals and other materials as inputs and identified separate finished products such as alloys, soldering flux, soldering paste and similar goods. Although a final product can, in a given context, also be an input, the particular returned goods in question were not covered by the description of inputs declared under Rule 57G. The cited precedent was distinguished because, there, the returned defective goods had been declared as inputs.

Conclusion: Modvat credit was not admissible on the returned goods as claimed, and the disallowance was on merits.

Ratio Decidendi: Credit under the Modvat scheme cannot be allowed on goods treated as inputs unless those goods are covered by the declaration of inputs required under Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules.

---