TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal penalizes respondents Rs. 25,000 for undervaluing imports, upholding customs regulations.</h1> The tribunal imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on the respondents under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962, for deliberately undervaluing imported metal ... Penalty - Undervaluation Issues: Misdeclaration of value for customs duty calculation, confiscation of goods, imposition of penalty under Customs Act, 1962Analysis:The judgment pertains to a case where the respondents, engaged in the manufacture and export of garments, imported metal zippers from Japan. The declared value of the zippers was Japanese Yen 6 per piece, but the Additional Collector determined the value to be Japanese Yen 56.79 per piece for customs duty calculation. The respondents did not challenge this valuation, indicating their awareness of the real value of the goods. The misdeclaration of value was deemed deliberate due to the significant undervaluation, which was about 1/9th of the actual value. This deliberate misdeclaration was a key issue in the case.In their defense, the respondents claimed that they received the zippers free of cost on the insistence of the Japanese buyer, who required the zippers to be fitted to the garments before export. The respondents argued that they would not be entitled to reimbursement of the duty paid on the zippers as per their agreement with the buyer. However, the tribunal found that the deliberate undervaluation was an attempt to evade duty, especially considering the respondents' familiarity with international trade prices. The tribunal concluded that the circumstances pointed towards a deliberate attempt to depress the value to reduce duty liability, leading to the imposition of a penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962.The tribunal disagreed with the Additional Collector's decision to drop the proposal for confiscation of the goods under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. It was deemed that the case warranted the imposition of a penalty due to the glaring nature of the deliberate misdeclaration of value. The tribunal emphasized that non-imposition of a penalty in such cases would be inconsistent with the law. Consequently, a penalty of Rs. 25,000 was imposed on the respondents under Section 112 of the Act. The appeal was allowed, overturning the decision to drop the penalty and highlighting the importance of upholding customs regulations and preventing duty evasion through undervaluation.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
