Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cored solder wire was correctly classifiable under Tariff Item No. 27A(5) instead of Tariff Item No. 68, and whether it was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 187/84-C.E. dated 1-8-1984.
Analysis: The impugned goods were manufactured by drawing wire bars containing cores filled with fluxing material, so the finished wire had no hollow portion and retained a solid cross-section. The absence of an express definition of "wire" in Tariff Item No. 27A did not justify importing limitations from other tariff items, especially when the goods were known in trade as wires and were described and sold as such. The use of the product for soldering did not alter its tariff identity, since end-use was not the criterion for classification. The lead content, with predominance by weight, brought the goods within the scope of Tariff Item No. 27A(5), and the exemption notification applied accordingly.
Conclusion: The cored solder wire was classifiable under Tariff Item No. 27A(5) and qualified for exemption under Notification No. 187/84-C.E. dated 1-8-1984.
Final Conclusion: The lower orders were set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: For tariff classification, a product must be construed according to its essential commercial and physical characteristics, and not by its end-use or by importing restrictive definitions from other tariff items where the governing entry does not so provide.