Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods initially cleared for home consumption, but later exported by purchasers or export houses, could be excluded from the aggregate clearances for computing the exemption limit under the relevant notifications.
Analysis: The benefit of the export exclusion was held to depend on the manufacturer's clearances being made for export. The respondents were not the exporters, there was no evidence that any specified clearances from the factory were made under bond or specifically for export, and the documents did not establish a direct correlation between the goods cleared by the respondents and the goods ultimately exported. The notifications could not be stretched to cover goods first removed for home consumption and subsequently exported by another party.
Conclusion: The exclusion of such clearances was not available to the respondents, and they remained liable to duty.
Final Conclusion: The appellate order granting exemption was set aside and the original demand was restored, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: To claim exclusion of clearances on the ground of export under an exemption notification, the manufacturer must establish that the clearances from the factory were made for export and must be able to correlate those clearances with the exported goods.