Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in the facts of the case, the applicants were entitled to stay of recovery and waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty on furnishing security instead of cash deposit.
Analysis: The applicants raised arguable questions on the applicability of exemption to texturised yarn manufactured from imported base yarn and relied on the Board circular and subsequent amendment to support their bona fide claim. The Tribunal also noted the plea that any duty paid would be recoverable by the main manufacturers through drawback and that the applicants had not acted with prima facie mala fides. At the same time, non-intimation to the Excise Department was not disputed and the exemption claim remained a triable issue. The financial material placed before the Tribunal showed that a cash deposit would cause hardship, so a secured arrangement was considered appropriate.
Conclusion: The applicants were granted waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery on furnishing a bank guarantee of Rs. 10 lakhs within the stipulated time, with liberty to seek early hearing.