Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit was admissible under Rule 57H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for inputs received before filing the declaration, and whether credit on bottles was liable to be denied when such packing material had already been covered by the declarations filed by the assessee.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the settled view that credit taken on inputs received before filing the Rule 57H application cannot be denied merely because prior permission was not obtained, provided the stock position on the relevant date and use of the inputs in dutiable final products are established. It noted that, in the present case, formal permission had in fact been granted under Rule 57H and the assessee's position was stronger than cases where credit had been taken without such permission. The Tribunal also found that bottles forming part of the disputed amount had already been included in the assessee's earlier and later declarations, and there is no requirement under the Modvat scheme of a one-to-one input-output correlation.
Conclusion: The denial of Modvat credit was not sustainable, and the assessee was entitled to restore the credit of Rs. 2,11,564/-.