Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the confirmed duty should be waived, and whether any amount should be directed to be deposited towards the penalty pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The applicants showed a strong prima facie case because the dispute arose from incorrect tariff classification in the Modvat declaration and the maintenance of a single register, while the department had not suffered any revenue loss. The order also noted substantial irregularities in the manner of record maintenance, which justified insisting on a part deposit towards penalty. In these circumstances, full pre-deposit of the duty demand was not warranted, but partial safeguard of the penalty amount was considered appropriate.
Conclusion: Pre-deposit of the duty confirmed was waived, while deposit of Rs. 3 lakhs towards penalty was directed, with the balance recovery stayed on compliance.