Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether milk crumb, an intermediate product in the manufacture of milk chocolate, was marketable goods and therefore excisable under Tariff Item No. 68.
Analysis: The decisive test applied was marketability, since excise attaches only to articles that can ordinarily come to the market to be bought and sold. The Department bore the burden of proving that the product was marketable. The record showed no adequate material to establish that milk crumb was bought and sold in the market, and the physical movement of the product between units did not by itself make it goods or prove marketability. The product was treated as an intermediate, in-process material, and the absence of convincing evidence of commercial marketability required the assessee to succeed.
Conclusion: Milk crumb was not proved to be marketable goods and was not exigible under Tariff Item No. 68; the finding was in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.