Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on carbon electrodes and nipples was admissible on the basis of a declaration filed under Rule 57G(5), and whether the penalty imposed could survive.
Analysis: The distinction between graphite electrodes and carbon electrodes was accepted, so a declaration for graphite electrodes could not by itself cover carbon electrodes. However, the later declaration filed on 17-5-1994 was found to cover the inputs received during the relevant period, and the benefit of Rule 57G(5) applied to the credit taken for that period. Since the credit was held to have been validly taken, the basis for the penalty also disappeared.
Conclusion: The credit was admissible and the penalty was unsustainable, both in favour of the assessee.