1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal dismissed for lack of evidence on component part classification under Heading 85.18/27(3).</h1> The appeal was dismissed as the appellants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claim that the imported Insulating screen and blade ... Classification The appellants imported Insulating screen and blade, claimed reassessment under Heading 85.18/27(3) as component part of air circuit breaker. Authorities rejected claim due to lack of evidence from catalogue or other material. Appellants argued absence in catalogue doesn't negate part status. Tribunal upheld rejection, stating catalogue didn't mention insulating screen as circuit breaker part, no other evidence provided. Appeal dismissed.