Specific tariff descriptions prevail over general entries; populated circuit boards were not covered by the licence and exemption failed.

Populated printed circuit boards were held not covered by a licence that referred only to general sub-assemblies, because the specific policy description for populated/loaded boards prevailed and the licence did not authorise the import; confiscation was upheld. The redemption fine was reduced because the importers were actual manufacturers and had produced supporting manufacturing records before the original authority. Notification No. 232/83-Customs was held inapplicable because Note 4 to Chapter 85 excluded populated circuit boards from the relevant tariff heading, so the exemption did not extend to the goods.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether populated printed circuit boards were covered by the import licence and could escape confiscation; (ii) whether the redemption fine deserved reduction; and (iii) whether the benefit of Notification No. 232/83-Customs was available.

Issue (i): whether populated printed circuit boards were covered by the import licence and could escape confiscation.

Analysis: The goods imported were found to be populated printed circuit boards and not plain printed circuit boards. The relevant import policy entry specifically described populated/loaded/printed circuit boards, whereas the relied-upon entries were general and referred to sub-assemblies. A specific description was held to prevail over a general one. The licence covered only goods falling in the stated appendices and was not transferable, so it did not authorise the import of the subject goods.

Conclusion: The import was not covered by the licence and confiscation was upheld.

Issue (ii): whether the redemption fine deserved reduction.

Analysis: The importers were actual manufacturers and had produced evidence before the original authority showing manufacturing-related approvals and records. That circumstance justified interference with the amount of fine.

Conclusion: The redemption fine was reduced.

Issue (iii): whether the benefit of Notification No. 232/83-Customs was available.

Analysis: The notification covered goods under Heading 8518/27 as then existing, but Note 4 to Chapter 85 excluded populated circuit boards from that tariff item. The goods therefore did not fall within the notification.

Conclusion: The benefit of the notification was not available.

Final Conclusion: The goods remained liable to confiscation for want of valid licence coverage, the exemption claim failed, and only the quantum of redemption fine was interfered with downward.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff or policy entry specifically describes the imported goods, that specific description prevails over a general entry, and an exemption notification cannot be applied when the goods are expressly excluded by the governing tariff note.

---