Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported captive power plant qualified for assessment under Heading 84.66 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as goods for initial setting up or substantial expansion of the fertiliser project.
Analysis: The benefit of project import classification was examined against the requirement that the goods must form part of the original project structure or be shown as part of a registered and existing contractual arrangement for the project. The record did not show that the captive power plant was conceived as an integral part of the fertiliser project at the time of its initial setting up, nor that it formed part of the producing machinery. The import was treated as a later addition to meet operational needs such as voltage fluctuations and power failures, rather than as machinery for manufacture of fertiliser or for substantial expansion of the plant.
Conclusion: The imported goods did not qualify for assessment under Heading 84.66 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the claim was rejected.