Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether stainless steel sheet both sides mirror finished was classifiable under Heading 73.15(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or under Heading 84.59(2) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The goods were identical to press plates earlier considered by the Tribunal in related matters. The governing approach was that mere form or finish was not decisive; the real question was whether the article functioned as a mould or as a part of machinery. Earlier orders had held such press plates to fall outside Heading 73.15 and to merit classification under the relevant machinery heading. In the present case, no material was produced to show that the imported goods were meant to function as moulds, and the record supported their treatment as parts used in a hydraulic press for manufacturing laminates.
Conclusion: The goods were not classifiable under Heading 73.15(2) and were correctly classifiable under Heading 84.59(2); the classification adopted by the lower authority was set aside in favour of the assessee.