Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether mafron gas used in the chilling process for polyester film yarn was an eligible input for Modvat credit even though it was not physically present in the final product.
Analysis: Mafr on gas was found to be used in the process of chilling molten or semi-solid polyester film yarn, and that process was treated as an essential part of manufacture. The reasoning accepted that an input need not physically remain present in the finished product to qualify for Modvat credit so long as it is used in or in relation to manufacture. The departmental contention that the gas was merely part of the plant system was rejected as unsupported by facts. Reliance was placed on the settled legal position and the departmental circular indicating that physical presence in the final product is not a prerequisite for admissibility.
Conclusion: Mafr on gas was held to be an eligible input used in manufacture, and Modvat credit was rightly allowed in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The departmental challenge to the grant of Modvat credit failed, and the order allowing credit was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: An input qualifies for Modvat credit if it is used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product, and its physical presence in the finished product is not essential.