Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sugar cubes, sugar sachets and pharmaceutical grade sugar, having sucrose content above 90%, were classifiable under sub-heading 1701.39 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 or under sub-heading 1701.90, and whether the rule of ejusdem generis could be used to exclude them from the specific sugar sub-headings.
Analysis: Note 2 to Chapter 17 defines "sugar" for the relevant sub-headings by reference to sucrose content exceeding 90%. The classification structure shows that sub-headings 1701.31 and 1701.39 are sub-classifications of sugar other than khandsari sugar, while sub-heading 1701.90 is a residual entry for goods not covered elsewhere. The products in question were admittedly sugar in a different form, and differences in packing, market value, or form did not take them outside the description of sugar once the Chapter note condition was satisfied. The rule of ejusdem generis was inapplicable to tariff headings in the manner suggested by the department.
Conclusion: The goods were classifiable under sub-heading 1701.39 and not under sub-heading 1701.90.