Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether syringe, needle and cotton swab forming part of an emergency kit for administering an antibiotic injection are eligible inputs for credit when the kit is treated as a composite item for excise assessment.
Analysis: The antibiotic alone would not make the syringe and cotton swab inputs, because they are used only for administration. However, once the kit is assessed and cleared as one composite item and the value of all its components is included in the assessable value, each component becomes part of the kit sold as a single product. In that situation, what is cleared is the emergency kit, not merely the antibiotic vial, and the syringe and cotton swab are used in relation to that composite product.
Conclusion: Credit on the duty paid on the syringe and cotton swab was admissible, and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was allowed because the disputed items were treated as inputs for the composite emergency kit and not merely as accessories for the antibiotic alone.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are cleared and assessed as a composite kit, components necessary for the kit's intended use are inputs for that composite product and credit cannot be denied merely because they are not used in the manufacture of the principal article alone.