Section 11A proviso not attracted where notice lacks fraud or suppression allegations; Superintendent's competence to issue notice remains intact.

A show cause notice alleging only that an assessee had wilfully availed of wrong notional higher credit, without alleging fraud, collusion, suppression of facts or wilful misstatement, does not attract the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On that footing, the extended limitation and any special competence tied to the proviso were not in issue, and the Superintendent or Assistant Collector remained competent to issue the notice within six months. The dispute was therefore required to be examined on merits, and penalty was viewed as not called for on the facts.

---

---

Issues: Whether, on the wording of the show cause notice and the absence of allegations of fraud, suppression of facts or wilful misstatement, the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was attracted and the Superintendent or Assistant Collector was competent to issue and adjudicate the notice issued within six months.

Analysis: The notice alleged only that the assessee had "wilfully availed of wrong notional higher credit". It did not allege fraud, collusion, suppression of facts or wilful misstatement, which are the ingredients of the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. On that reading, the dispute was not one invoking the extended limitation or the special competence of the Collector. The notice was within six months, and the ordinary authority of the Superintendent or Assistant Collector to issue the notice remained intact. The earlier order setting aside the proceedings solely on the ground of want of competence was therefore not justified. The proper course was for the appellate authority to examine the sustainability of the demand on merits. The penalty aspect was viewed as not called for on the facts.

Conclusion: The proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was not attracted on the terms of the notice, and the Superintendent or Assistant Collector was competent to issue the show cause notice; the matter was required to be decided on merits.

---