Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether lead ingots used for coating rubber hose pipes during manufacture are eligible inputs for Modvat credit under Rule 57A, or are excluded as an appliance or apparatus used for shaping or processing the final product.
Analysis: The lead was found to be poured as a molten coating on the raw rubber hose pipe, after which the coated pipe was cured and the lead was later scraped off and recycled. On these facts, no separate lead mould came into existence. The material was used in the course of manufacture and in relation to the final product, and it did not fall within the exclusion in the Explanation to Rule 57A for machines, machinery, apparatus, appliances, tools or similar articles. The fact that the coating was repeatedly used and later recovered did not alter its character as an input.
Conclusion: The lead ingots were eligible inputs for Modvat credit and were not excluded appliances or apparatus under Rule 57A.
Final Conclusion: The revenue challenge failed, and the appellate order allowing Modvat credit to the assessee was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Material used during manufacture in a recurring process, where it functions as an input in relation to the final product and does not itself constitute a machine, apparatus or appliance, qualifies for Modvat credit unless expressly excluded by the rule.