Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dispute relating to eligibility to benefit under Notification No. 201/79-C.E. fell within the jurisdiction of the Special Bench under the provision governing appeals having relation to the rate of duty of excise.
Analysis: The majority held that the notification granted an exemption in a form affecting the computation of duty payable on the final product and, although not expressing a direct question of rate, it had sufficient relation to the rate of duty within the meaning of the jurisdictional provision. The expression "having relation to" was treated as enough to include indirect as well as direct connection with the rate of duty. On that basis, the matter was held not to be confined to a Regional Bench. The minority view held that the dispute concerned only the quantum of credit or adjustment and did not involve the rate of duty, and therefore should not be treated as a Special Bench matter.
Conclusion: The dispute was held to fall within the jurisdiction of the Special Bench and not the Regional Bench.
Dissenting Opinion: The dissenting members held that the issue concerned only the amount of duty credit or adjustment under the notification and did not involve a question having relation to the rate of duty; therefore, jurisdiction lay with the Regional Bench.