Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether synthesis gas is classifiable under Heading 27.05 of the Central Excise Tariff as similar gas, or under Heading 2804.90 as claimed by the department; and whether exemption notifications referring to Chapter 28 control the tariff classification.
Analysis: The exemption notification was held to be only an indicator and not a determinant of classification. Classification had to be resolved by the tariff entries, section notes, chapter notes, and relevant legal principles. Heading 2804 was found inapplicable because it covers hydrogen, rare gases, and other non-metals, whereas the product is a mixture of gases and not an individual chemical element. The expression "similar" in Heading 27.05 was applied in its ordinary legal sense of resemblance and not identity. On the composition, mode of production, and use, synthesis gas was found to bear sufficient likeness to coal gas, water gas, and producer gas. The technical report and the HSN-based approach supported classification under Heading 27.05.
Conclusion: Synthesis gas was held classifiable under Heading 27.05 and not under Heading 2804.90, and the departmental challenge to that classification failed.