Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount required to be deposited under the pre-deposit provision could be temporarily adjusted by debiting the appellant's Modvat credit account.
Analysis: The deposit mandated by the statute and the credit available in the Modvat account were treated as distinct in form, but the statutory requirement had to be understood in the light of the Modvat scheme. The tribunal held that refusing temporary adjustment would effectively compel a double payment, since the credit continued to stand in the account while cash deposit would also be required. Since any adjustment during the pendency of the appeal would remain subject to the final outcome, permitting such temporary debit would not prejudice either side. The tribunal also noted its earlier practice of granting similar permission.
Conclusion: Temporary adjustment out of the Modvat credit account was permitted to the extent of the available credit, subject to the result of the appeal.
Final Conclusion: The appellant was granted interim relief allowing compliance with the deposit requirement through temporary Modvat adjustment rather than immediate cash payment.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory pre-deposit requirement may be satisfied by temporary adjustment from available Modvat credit where the adjustment is subject to the appeal and does not prejudice the final rights of the parties.