MODVAT credit on bottles and crates required fuller factual inquiry before eligibility under Rule 57A could be reconsidered.

MODVAT credit on bottles and crates used in manufacturing aerated waters depended on a fuller factual inquiry into whether packing-material cost had already been included in the assessable value or otherwise taken into account for duty purposes. The record also referred to breakages, depreciation and repair charges, but those aspects had not been fully examined, and the order had proceeded on assumptions about buyer deposits and recovery of packing-material cost. Eligibility under Rule 57A could not be determined satisfactorily on the existing material. The order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration after giving the appellants a reasonable opportunity to produce evidence and be heard.

---

---

Issues: Whether MODVAT credit on bottles and crates used in the manufacture of aerated waters was admissible, and whether the matter required fresh consideration in view of the evidence on inclusion of packing-material cost and the basis of the assumptions made below.

Analysis: The appeal turned on whether the cost of bottles and crates had been included in the assessable value or had otherwise been taken into account while the duty was fixed at a specific rate for the relevant period. The record also contained material on breakages, depreciation and repair charges, but the lower authority had not examined those aspects fully. The order proceeded on assumptions regarding deposits from buyers and did not call for complete data on deposits or on the recovery of packing-material cost. In these circumstances, the question of eligibility under Rule 57A could not be satisfactorily decided without a fuller factual inquiry.

Conclusion: The order was set aside and the matter was remanded for reconsideration of the MODVAT credit claim after affording the appellants a reasonable opportunity to produce evidence and be heard.

---